Skip to main content
Log in

Astragalus (Fabaceae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective

  • Systematics
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nucleotide sequences of the plastidmatK gene and nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer region were sampled fromAstragalus L. (Fabaceae), and its closest relatives within tribe Galegeae, to infer phylogenetic relationships and estimate ages of diversification. Consistent with previous studies that emphasized sampling for nrDNA ITS primarily within either New World or Old World species groups,Astragalus, with the exception of a few morphologically distinct species, is strongly supported as monophyletic based on maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses ofmatK sequences as well as a combined sequence dataset. ThematK data provides better resolution and stronger clade support for relationships amongAstragalus and traditionally related genera than nrDNA ITS.Astragalus sensu stricto plus the genusOxytropis are strongly supported as sister to a clade composed of strictly Old World (African, Australasian) genera such asColutea. Sutherlandia, Lessertia, Swainsona, andCarmichaelia, plus several morphologically distinct segregates of EurasianAstragalus. Ages of these clades and rates of nucleotide substitution estimated from a fossil-constrained, rate-smoothed, Bayesian analysis ofmatK sequences sampled from Hologalegina indicateAstragalus diverged from its sister group,Oxtropis, 12–16 Ma, with divergence of Neo-Astragalus beginning ca 4.4. Ma. Estimates of absolute rates of nucleotide substitution forAstragalus and sister groups, which range from 8.9 to 10.2×10−10 substitutions per site per year, are not unusual when compared to those estimated for other, mainly temperate groups of papilionoid legumes. The results of previously published work and other recent developments on the phylogenetic relationships and diversification ofAstragalus are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baldwin, B. G. &M. J. Sanderson. 1998. Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 95: 9402–9406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barneby, R. C.. 1952. A revision of the North American species ofOxytropis DC. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series IV, 27: 177–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964. Atlas of North AmericanAstragalus. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 13: 1–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrov, E. G., A. G. Borisova, B. A. Fedchenko, S. G. Gorshkova, Y. S. Grigor’ev, A. A. Grossgeim, A. N. Krishtofovich, I. A. Linchevskii, A. S. Lozina-Lozinskaya, I. V. Palibin, K. K. Shaparenko, B. K. Shishkin, I. T. Vasil’chenko &V. N. Vasil’ev. 1972. Leguminosae:Oxytropis, Hedysarum. Pages 1–229.In: V. L. Komarov, B. K. Shishkin & E. G. Bobrov, editor. Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 13. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, Smithsonian Institution and the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borissova, A. 1937. GenusTragacantha Mill. Pages 479–497.In: Flora Tadzhikistanica. Vol. 5. Moscow.

  • Bunge, A. von 1868. Generis Astragali species Gerontogeae. Pars prior. Claves diagnosticae Mémoires de l’ Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg, Septième Série 11: 1–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1869. Generis Astragali species Gerontogeae. Pars Altera: Specierum enumeratio, Mémories de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg, Septième Série 15: 1–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., J. L. Doyle, J. A. Ballenger, E. E. Dickson, T. Kajita &H. Ohashi. 1997. A phylogeny of the chloroplast generbcL in the Leguminosae: taxonomic correlations and insights into the evolution of nodulation. American Journal of Botany 84: 541–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, T.. 1992. Petiolar anatomy of North AmericanAstragalus species (Fabaceae) with persistent petioles. Aliso 13: 339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J.. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, J. B.. 1963.Astragalus L. (Leguminosae) in the highlands of tropical Africa. Kew Bulletin 17: 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Sosa, E.. 1979. Las especies Sudamericanas del géneroAstragalus (Leguminosae) I. Las especies Patagónicas Argentinas, Darwiniana 22: 313–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. Novedades en el géneroAstragalus (Leguminosae-Galegeae). Darwiniana 23: 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997.Astragalus johnstonii sp. nov. (Fabaceae) y relaciones con el complejoA. verticillatus (Phil.) Reiche. Gayana Botánica 54: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncharov, N. F., A. G. Borisova, S. G. Gorshkova, M. G. Popov &I. T. Vasil’chenko. 1965. Leguminosae:Astragalus. Pages 1–198.In: V. L. Komarov & B. K. Shishkin, editors. Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 12. Israel Program for Scientific Translations. Jerusalem, Smithsoniar Institution and the National Science Foundation, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1864. A revision and arrangement (mainly by the fruit) of the North American species ofAstragalus andOxytropis. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 6: 188–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herendeen, P. S., W. L. Crepet &D. L. Dilcher. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Pages 303–316.In: P. S. Herendeen & D. L. Dilcher, editors. Advances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil recor. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J.-M., M. Lavin, M. F. Wojciechowski &M. J. Sanderson. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8. S sequences in the tribe Millettieae (Fabaceae):Poecilanthe-Cyclolobium, the core Millettieae, and theCallerya group. Systematic Botany 27: 722–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller &F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pifalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — &F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikonnikov, S. 1977. Notae de flora Badachschanica. 4. Nov. Sist. Vyss. Rast. 14: 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isely, D.. 1998. Native and naturalized Leguminosae (Fabaceae) of the United States. M. L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provov, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. M.. 1938. Notes on someAstragalus species of Ecuador and Peru. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 19: 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1947.Astragalus in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 28: 336–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajita, T., H. Ohashi, Y. Tateishi, C. D. Bailey &J. J. Doyle. 2001.rbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and allies. Systematic Botany 26: 515–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y. &M.-L. Zhang. 2004. Study of pollen brush in selected species ofAstragalus L. subgenusPogonophace Bunge (Leguminosae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 249: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— &Z.-D. Chen. 2003. A preliminary phylogenetic study of the subgenusPogonophace (Astragalus) in China based on ITS sequence data. Acta Botanica Sinica 45: 140–145.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazempour Osaloo, S., A. A. Maassoumi &N. Murakami. 2003. Molecular systematics of the genusAstragalus L. (Fabaceae): phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers and chloroplast genendhF sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 242: 1–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazempour Osaloo, S., A. A. Maassoumi N. Murakami. 2005. Molecular systematics of the Old World Astragalus L. (Fabaceae) as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence, data. Brittonia 57 (in press).

  • Lavin, M., J. J. Doyle &J. D. Palmer. 1990. Evolutionary significance of the loss of the chloroplast-DNA inverted repeat in the Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae. Evolution 44: 390–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,P. S. Herendeen &M. F. Wojciechowski. 2005. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Systematic Biology 54: 575–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —,M. F. Wojciechowski, P. Gasson, C. Hughes &E. Wheeler. 2003. Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited:Coursetia andGliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Systematic Botany 28: 387–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledingham, G. F. 1957. Chromosome numbers of some Saskatchewan Leguminosae with particular reference, toAstragalus andOxytropis. Canadian Journal of Botany 35: 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1960. Chromosome numbers inAstragalus andOxytropis. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 2: 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. P., B. D. Schrire, B. A. Mackinder &M. Lock, editors. 2005. Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston, A.. 1992. Variation in the chloroplast genesrpoC1 andrpoC2 of, the genusAstragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from restriction site mapping of a PCR-amplified fragment. American Journal of Botany 79: 953–961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. Use of the polymerase chain reaction to survey for the loss of the inverted repeat in the legume chloroplast genome. Pages 31–40.In: M. D. Crisp & J. J. Doyle, editors, Advances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. A. Wheeler, 1994. The phylogenetic position of the genusAstragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from the chloroplast genesrpoC1 andrpoC2. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 22: 377–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, J. M. &K. Simpson. 1991. Legumes of West Asia, a check-list, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley, D. J., 1997. The Plant-Book, a portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Ed. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, H. D. 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant, beds, Colorado. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 599.

  • Bagallón, S. &M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55: 1762–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, V. A., 1970.Biserrula. Pages 48–49.In: P. H. Davis, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlech, D. 1982. Neue aspekte zur evolution und gliederung der gattungAstragalus L Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 18: 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. Zur Taxonomie und Nomenclatur der tragacanthoiden Astragali. Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 19: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. Revision vonAstragalus L. sect.Herpocaulos Bunge. Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 20: 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. Die typifizierung der altweltlichen Sektionen der GattungAstragalus L. (Leguminosae). Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 29: 461–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. The systematics of the annual species of the genusAstragalus L. (Leguminosae). Flora et Vegetatio Mundi 9: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. Revision der altweltlichen anuellen Arten der GattungAstragalus L. (Leguminosae). Sendtnera 2: 39–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M. 1981a. Papilionoideae. Pages 191–208.In: R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven, editors. Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981b. Galegeae. Pages 357–363.In: R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven, editors. Advances in legume systematics. Part 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada, D. &K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg, P. A.. 1929. Astragalanae. North American Flora 24: 251–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. J.. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships within North AmericanAstragalus L. (Fabaceae). Systematic Botany 16: 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 101–109.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 2003. Ros, version 1.6, User’s Manual. Distributed by the author. <http://ginger.ucdavis.edu/r8s/> University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. J. Doyle. 1993. Phylogenetic relation-ships in North AmericanAstragalus (Fabaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 18: 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &M. F. Wojciechowski. 1996. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: are there so many species ofAstragalus (Fabaceae)? American Journal of Botany 83: 1488–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherson, R., H.-K. Choi, D. R. Cook & M. J. Sanderson. 2005. Phylogenetics of New WorldAstragalus: the utility of genomics technology in reconstructing phylogenies at low taxonomic levels. Britonia 57 (in press).

  • Swofford, D. L. 2002.PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubert, P. 1894. Leguminosae. Pages 70–385In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, editors. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol. III. Verlag von W. Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, S. J., P. B. Heenan &M. J. Sanderson. 1999. Classification, origins, and patterns of diversification in New Zealand Carmichaelinae (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1346–1356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, S. L., 2001. Revision of North American species ofOxytropis de Candolle (Leguminosae). E.P.S., Inc. Orem, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenninger, J.. 1991. Revision vonAstragalus L. sect.Chlorostachys Bunge, sect.Phyllobium Bunge und sect.Skythropos Bunge (Leguminosae). Mitteilungen (aus) der Botanischen Staatssammlung München 30: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, M. F., M. Lavin &M. J. Sanderson. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of, the plastidmatK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1846–1862.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,M. J. Sanderson, B. G. Baldwin &M. J. Donoghue. 1993. Monophyly of aneuploidAstragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. American Journal of Botany 80: 711–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —— &J.-M. Hu. 1999. Evidence on the monophyly ofAstragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNAtrnL intron data. Systematic Botany 24: 409–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——,K. P. Steele &A. Liston. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the “temperate herbaceous tribes” of papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. Pages 277–298.In: P. S. Herendeen & A. Bruneau, editors. Advances in legume systematics. Part 9. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarre, S. &D. Podlech. 1997. Problems in the taxonomy of TragacanthicAstragalus. Sendtnera 4: 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin F. Wojciechowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wojciechowski, M.F. Astragalus (Fabaceae): A molecular phylogenetic perspective. Brittonia 57, 382–396 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2005)057[0382:AFAMPP]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2005)057[0382:AFAMPP]2.0.CO;2

Key words

Navigation